The police investigator did not pass all the materials to the expert and asked the advantageous questions! The incident occurred 28.02.2013, both examinations were conducted by the expert O.V.Soboleva, in the expert opinion 2009-M from 29.04.2013 one wound of the leg was found, in the expert opinion 4002-D from 13.072013 six wounds of the leg were found.
The number of wounds increased six-times during the period from 29.04.2013 to 3.07.2013. According to the conclusion of the same expert when examining the same person K.V.Alekseev! The victim K.V.Alekseev was present at the forensic medical examination. K.V.Alekseev found out about the appointment of the examination three days after it was conducted as it is said in the report of the familiarization with the decision on the appointment of the expertise.
Who was examined by a the forensic medical expert?
The victim K.V.Alekseev's wounds of the leg are not considered grievous bodily harm by law, but the forensic medical expert broke the law and described them as a serious bodily injury!
What did the judge decide? "The implementation of the case's forensic medical expertises №2009-M and №4002-D confirmed the number, location, and nature of the formation of the bodily injury "
That's it!
You simply list them separated by commas and say that they confirm everything!
The Court of Appeal decided: "All the evidence proves and complements itself ..."
Is one wound of the leg not enough for the prosecution do the need six?
No problem!
Russia is a country of unlimited possibilities!
Source page.
No comments:
Post a Comment