The European Convention on Human Rights declares the right to a fair trial! I faced the fact that the police prosecutors and courts violate this right in Russia! The police fabricated the criminal case, the prosecutor's office - the criminal charge, the court deprived me of the opportunity to defend may innocence. If a person is deprived of the opportunity to defend himself, he can be accused of anything! I could not defend my right to a fair trial in Russia and I appealed to the European Court of Human Rights.
I was attacked by a hooligan. I hurt his leg defending myself from his kicks. The court accused me of assaulting on the hooligan and intentionally causing harm to his health!
The court sentenced me to three years probation!
Article 6 $ 3d: The court refused me in the interrogation of a witness B.S.Ushakov
B.S.Ushakov testified during the preliminary investigation (page 111 Attachment 8)
and give explanation to the investigator (page 115 Attachment 9). In his testimony he pointed out the number and nature of K.V.Alekseev's leg injuries. Medical card of the inpatient №5779 / 196, Tomsk Regional Clinical Hospital, filled by B.S.Ushakov, used in forensic medical examinations 2009-M of 29.04.2013 (page 116 Attachment 10) and 4002-D of 13.07.2013 (page 119 Attachment 11), on the basis of these data, the experts identified serious bodily harm, and the court found me guilty of causing injury leg and qualify as serious bodily harm. The court refused to interrogate the witness! Record of interrogation of witness B.S.Ushakov (page 111 Attachment 8) was not pronounced in the court!
Article 6 $ 1: The right to public hearing was violated.
I was not promptly informed of the appointment of expertise and was not acquainted with the decision on the appointment of expertise, expertises were appointed and held in secret from me. It violated the right of a public hearing! I was denied the opportunity to apply for an introduction of a forensic medical examinations additional questions to the expert into the resolution on an appointment, apply for a personal presence during the forensic medical examinations, apply for challenge the expert or conduct examination in the other expert institution.
The resolution on an appointment of a forensic medical examinations 2009-M were passed 08.04.2013 (page 125 Attachment 13), the examination was carried out in the period from 04.29.2013 to 06.05.2013, I was acquainted with the resolution on an appointment of a forensic medical examinations a month after a forensic medical examinations was finished, 11.06.2013 (page 126 Attachment 14).
The resolution on an appointment of a forensic medical examinations 4002-D were passed 12.07.2013 (page 127 Attachment 15), the examination was carried out in the period from 13.07.2013 to 16.07.2013, I was acquainted with the resolution on an appointment of a forensic medical examinations a month after a forensic medical examinations was finished, 19.07.2013 (page 128 Attachment 16).
5. Article 6 $1,The court refused me in the interrogation of the forensic medical expert O.V.Soboleva (page 69 Attachment 6).
The application for in the interrogation of expert was made to challenge the reliability of the expert opinion.
The incident occurred 28.02.2013, both examinations were conducted by the expert O.V.Soboleva, in the expert opinion 2009-M from 29.04.2013 (page 116 Attachment 10) one wound on the leg was found, in the expert opinion 4002-D from 13.07.2013 (page 116 Attachment 10) six wounds on the leg were found.
The number of wounds increased six-fold during the period from 29.04.2013 to 13.07.2013, in the conclusion of the same expert examining the same person K.V.Alekseev!
The court accused me of this!
